Why Pneumatic Clamping and Dart Release Design Matter in Impact Testing

Why Pneumatic Clamping and Dart Release Design Matter in Impact Testing

An in-depth look at how clamping force, gasket design, and dart release mechanisms influence dart impact accuracy and repeatability.

Why Pneumatic Clamping and Dart Release Design Matter in Impact Testing

When engineers think about dart impact testing, they often focus on standards, methods, and data analysis. However, the mechanical design of the test fixture—the clamping system and the dart release mechanism—can be just as important. Poor hardware design can introduce systematic errors and scatter that no amount of statistical analysis can fix.

Clamping is the first key area. The purpose of the clamp is to hold the film securely around a circular opening, ensuring that the film cannot slip during impact and that the boundary conditions match the standard’s intent. Pneumatic clamping offers a major advantage over manual clamps because it can be set to a consistent pressure and applied uniformly around the ring. This reduces operator-dependent variability and helps ensure that each sample is tested under the same conditions.

The gasket material between the clamp and the film is another factor. Standards typically specify hardness and dimensions for the rubber ring to achieve a controlled clamping interface. If the gasket is too soft, the film may not be held firmly enough; if it is too hard, it may damage the film edge or change the stress distribution near the clamped region. Regular inspection and replacement of gaskets, along with adherence to specified hardness values, are essential for maintaining compliance and consistency.

The dart release mechanism determines how the dart begins its fall. Ideally, the dart should be held in a stable, centered position and released without imparting any extra horizontal force or rotation. Mechanical 3-jaw grippers driven by pneumatic cylinders can provide a clean release by withdrawing the jaws symmetrically. In contrast, electromagnetic release systems can be susceptible to residual magnetism, which may cause light darts to stick momentarily or heavy darts to be held inconsistently. Such effects can alter the effective drop height or introduce sideways motion, affecting repeatability.

Taken together, these hardware elements—pneumatic clamping, standard-compliant gaskets, and a clean, symmetric release mechanism—form the foundation for reliable impact testing. Investing in high-quality test fixtures and maintaining them properly allows laboratories to focus on interpreting results and improving materials, rather than chasing unexplained variability caused by the test equipment itself.

About Author
Amy Gu
Amy Gu
Amy Gu is a Senior Technical Specialist and Product Manager at KHT, with over 8 years of expertise in material mechanics and flexible packaging testing. She holds a Master's degree in Material Science and specializes in impact resistance analysis for the pharmaceutical, food, and logistics industries. Amy has successfully led the deployment of KHT's MLB Series Falling Dart Impact Testers globally, helping clients ensure strict compliance with ASTM D1709, ISO 7765, and GB/T 9639 standards. Her deep understanding of the 'Staircase Method' and pneumatic clamping technologies enables her to provide expert guidance on film durability, preventing costly packaging failures during transport. Amy is committed to delivering high-precision impact testing solutions that meet the rigorous safety demands of modern quality control laboratories.

Ready to Prevent Packaging Failure?

Act Now

Get the factory-direct precision you need to comply with ASTM D1709, ISO 7765-1, and GB/T 9639.1. Contact KHT for a customized quote today.

View our privacy policy.

© 2025 KHT MLB-01 Impact Tester | All rights reserved.